[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1315885442.3180.86.camel@work-vm>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:44:02 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 23:18 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 18:16 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > The C6X architecture includes a 64-bit free running core clock counter which
> > > is used as the clocksource. The SoCs have a number of 64-bit programmable
> > > timers. One of these is used as the clockevent timer.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> >
> > Sort of a tangent to this specific patch, but since it came up
> > recently in the x32 discussion, I wanted to check if you were using a
> > 64bit definition of time_t?
>
> C6X uses the asm-generic definition which is a long, so 32-bits.
You might want to seriously consider following the x32 folks and use 64
bits, as 2038 isn't very far away.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists