linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1315883885.11280.34.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:18:04 -0400
From:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management

On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 18:16 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> > The C6X architecture includes a 64-bit free running core clock counter which
> > is used as the clocksource. The SoCs have a number of 64-bit programmable
> > timers. One of these is used as the clockevent timer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> 
> Sort of a tangent to this specific patch, but since it came up
> recently in the x32 discussion, I wanted to check if you were using a
> 64bit definition of time_t?

C6X uses the asm-generic definition which is a long, so 32-bits.

--Mark


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/