[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:16:00 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ming.lei@...onical.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/24] C6X: time management
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com> wrote:
> The C6X architecture includes a 64-bit free running core clock counter which
> is used as the clocksource. The SoCs have a number of 64-bit programmable
> timers. One of these is used as the clockevent timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Sort of a tangent to this specific patch, but since it came up
recently in the x32 discussion, I wanted to check if you were using a
64bit definition of time_t?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists