linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide delayed wakeup list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E70CD20.1010501@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:49:52 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide delayed wakeup list



On 09/14/2011 08:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:35 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> Missing here is what the value of state should be when
>> calling wake_up_list. 
> 
> Depends on what all you want to wake up :-) Would a reference to the
> comment of try_to_wake_up() be good enough?

I found it by following the calls as well, and any serious developer
could as well. I just find the kerneldoc headers to be very valuable as
reference and I like to encourage their use when I can. This isn't a
huge deal, just a nudge to see if it sticks ;)

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/