linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Per-cgroup /proc/stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1316076989.3045.8.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:56:29 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
	paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
	mingo@...e.hu, jbottomley@...allels.com,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Per-cgroup /proc/stat

On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 13:23 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
> >
> > Guys we should seriously trim back a lot of that code, not grow ever
> > more and more. The sad fact is that if you build a kernel with
> > cpu-cgroup support the context switch cost is more than double that of a
> > kernel without, and then you haven't even started creating cgroups yet.
> 
> That sounds indeed quite bad. Is it known why it is so costly?

Mostly because all data structures grow and all code paths grow, some by
quite a bit, its spread all over the place, lots of little cuts etc..

pjt and I tried trimming some of the code paths with static_branch() but
didn't really get anywhere.. need to get back to looking at this stuff
sometime soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/