[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316448186.1511.19.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:03:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...allels.com,
paul@...lmenage.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
mingo@...e.hu, jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 17:04 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> + for (; ca; ca = parent_ca(ca)) {
It might be good to check that the loop condition and null condition in
the parent_ca() function get folded. Otherwise there's a double branch
in that loop.
Note that this function is one of the reasons I dislike cpuacct, it adds
a second cgroup hierarchy traversal to every context switch.
Cache-miss heaven all this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists