[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110917035611F.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:05:58 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc: thellstrom@...are.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
thomas@...pmail.org, pq@....fi, bskeggs@...hat.com,
j.glisse@...hat.com, airlied@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
alexdeucher@...il.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Expose swiotlb_nr_tlb function to modules
as swiotlb_enabled
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:47 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> As a mechanism to detect whether SWIOTLB is enabled or not.
> And as such, we might as well wrap it within an 'swiotlb_enabled()'
> function that will call the swiotlb_nr_tlb.
>
> We also fix the spelling - it was swioltb instead of
> swiotlb.
>
> CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/swiotlb.h | 7 ++++++-
> lib/swiotlb.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Can we just use swiotlb_nr_tbl() rather than inventing a new function
that only wraps swiotlb_nr_tbl()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists