[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110916205410.GA16370@phenom.oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:54:10 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: thellstrom@...are.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
thomas@...pmail.org, airlied@...ux.ie, pq@....fi,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
bskeggs@...hat.com, alexdeucher@...il.com, airlied@...hat.com,
j.glisse@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Expose swiotlb_nr_tlb
function to modules as swiotlb_enabled
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 04:05:58AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:47 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > As a mechanism to detect whether SWIOTLB is enabled or not.
> > And as such, we might as well wrap it within an 'swiotlb_enabled()'
> > function that will call the swiotlb_nr_tlb.
> >
> > We also fix the spelling - it was swioltb instead of
> > swiotlb.
> >
> > CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 7 ++++++-
> > lib/swiotlb.c | 5 +++--
> > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Can we just use swiotlb_nr_tbl() rather than inventing a new function
> that only wraps swiotlb_nr_tbl()?
Absolutly. Will do that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists