[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110919152505.GB6830@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:25:05 -0500
From: "Linas Vepstas (Code Aurora)" <linas@...eaurora.org>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@...esourcery.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [patch v3 19/36] Hexagon: Add ptrace support
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Saturday 10 September 2011 07:42:26, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>
> > I'm really not an expert on GDB, but I believe it can use either the
> > PEEK/POKE functions to access regs, or it can use GET/SETREGS; it's an
> > architecture-dependent configuration. I think the second variant can
> > be easily modified to become GET/SETREGSET instead, and the PEEK/POKE
> > variant wouldn't be needed at all.
>
> Yes, the x86/x86-64 ports or gdb and gdbserver are already
> using GET/SETREGSET even.
Reading the code, it seemed to only fetch "extended state" in
this way, and not all of the registers. Am I mistaken?
--linas
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists