[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110921124936.GA25620@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:49:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dilinger@...ued.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: allow mfd_cell association with device tree
node
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:01:48PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> @@ -37,6 +38,9 @@ struct mfd_cell {
> void *platform_data;
> size_t pdata_size;
>
> + /* association with device tree node (optional) */
> + struct device_node *of_node;
> +
This doesn't seem great as it means that the mfd_cells can't be static
data, they have to be allocated per device. Why can't the MFD cells get
at the OF node by using the parent device in the same way as they
(mostly) get platform data at the minute?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists