[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316614268.16137.280.camel@nimitz>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:11:08 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>, avi@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de,
riel@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
aliguori@...ibm.com, raharper@...ibm.com, kvm-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>, mjwolf@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by
host
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 16:55 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > and the wall clock stays behind my host wall clock by the amount of
> > time it took to resume.
>
> This is expected, similar to savevm/loadvm.
That seems like pretty undesirable behavior to me. It's too bad that it
does that with savevm/loadvm, but is it really behavior that we want to
spread?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists