linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201109211612.33504.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:12:33 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	"Ohad Ben-Cohen" <ohad@...ery.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next

On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> [110920 01:34]:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com> wrote:
> > 
> > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> > 
> > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a
> > bulk of OMAP changes.
> > 
> > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for
> > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're
> > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point
> > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500
> > does).
> > 
> > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to
> > send you pull requests of course.
> 
> I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers.
> 
> If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only,
> I can take it then.

Sorry for replying late, I had accidentally ignored the entire thread.

My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly
to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed
as the maintainer (well, after this series at least).

I'm also fine with any of the other paths like

ohad->GregKH->torvalds
ohad->arnd->torvalds
ohad->tmlind->torvalds
ohad->tmlind->arnd->torvalds

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/