linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHH2K0ZMq_jCGr3m3PZDtmDwHUXnnL-fuQDt-A-SdUKgeK6P6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:44:11 -0700
From:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:01:46PM -0700, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
>> > +static inline bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
>> > +{
>> > +       return (mem == root_mem_cgroup);
>> > +}
>> > +
>>
>> Why are you adding a copy of mem_cgroup_is_root().  I see one already
>> in v3.0.  Was it deleted in a previous patch?
>
> mem_cgroup_is_root() moved up in the file.

Got it.  Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/