linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm/tegra: Move EN_VDD_1V05

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1739554CBD@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:31:48 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC:	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Erik Gilling <konkers@...roid.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] arm/tegra: Move EN_VDD_1V05_GPIO to board-harmony.h

Russell King - ARM Linux wrote at Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:12 AM:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:16:49PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Works for me. Or I could stage it in a topic branch that would be
> > merged after Russell's GPIO tree.
> 
> Holding stuff off from being merged doesn't work.

Russell,

So I take it I should add the two ack'd patches to the ARM patch system,
and have you pick them up?

Thanks.

> If you have the following commit structure:
> 
> A---...-----M1-B-C-M2
> +---A1-B1-C1'     /
> +-A2-B2-C2-------'
> 
> Now, lets say A2 depends on C1.  Merely delaying the stuff so that M2
> happens after M1 is insufficient to ensure git state doesn't break.
> When bisecting, its entirely possible that the bisect algorithm may
> chose B2 as a potential test candidate.  At that point you end up with
> A2, but without C1.
> 
> The only way to solve this is to have A2 following on from C1 - which
> of course requires A1..C1 to be declared stable and either pulled into
> your local tree or for A2..C2 to be submitted to the same tree which
> A1..C1 are already in.

-- 
nvpupblic

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/