[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7186.1316799377@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 13:36:17 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: frank.rowand@...sony.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] preempt-rt: allow immediate Magic SysRq output for PREEMPT_RT_FULL
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:05:56 PDT, Frank Rowand said:
> Change from V1 to V2: add drivers/tty/serial/8250.c
> drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/mfd.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/nwpserial.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/sunhv.c | 4 2 + 2 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/sunsab.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/sunsu.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/sunzilog.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> drivers/tty/serial/xilinx_uartps.c | 2 1 + 1 - 0 !
> if (up->port.sysrq)
> locked = 0;
> - else if (oops_in_progress) {
> + else if (oops_in_progress || sysrq_in_progress) {
> locked = spin_trylock(&up->port.lock);
> } else
> spin_lock(&up->port.lock);
Is it time to create a helper function for this chunk of code that appears
in almost identical form in a dozen drivers?
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists