[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E804440.7030709@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:22:08 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] at91: add Atmel ISI and ov2640 support on sam9m10/sam9g45
board.
Le 24/09/2011 07:26, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 09:35 Thu 22 Sep , Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Josh Wu wrote:
>>
>>> This patch
>>> 1. add ISI_MCK parent setting code when add ISI device.
>>> 2. add ov2640 support on board file.
>>> 3. define isi_mck clock in sam9g45 chip file.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 3 +
>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h | 3 +-
>>
>> Personally, I think, it would be better to separate this into two patches
>> at least: one for at91 core and one for the specific board, but that's up
>> to arch maintainers to decide.
>>
>> You also want to patch arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c, don't
>> you?
> agreed
No, I am not sure. The IP is not the same between 9263 and 9g45/9m10. So
this inclusion will not apply.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists