[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110927122041.GL18553@somewhere>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:20:44 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c between commit a0bfa1373859 ("cpuidle: stop
> depending on pm_idle") from Linus' tree and commit 18349ca4b42e ("x86:
> Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call") from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> index f693e44,dee2e6c..0000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@@ -137,8 -136,12 +137,14 @@@ void cpu_idle(void
> enter_idle();
> /* Don't trace irqs off for idle */
> stop_critical_timings();
> - if (cpuidle_idle_call())
> +
> - /* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
> - rcu_enter_nohz();
> - pm_idle();
> - rcu_exit_nohz();
> ++ if (cpuidle_idle_call()) {
> ++ /* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
> ++ rcu_enter_nohz();
> + pm_idle();
> ++ rcu_exit_nohz();
> ++ }
> +
> start_critical_timings();
>
> /* In many cases the interrupt that ended idle
Looks good, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists