[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110927160411.7bcec0906847959fb6e88a81@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:04:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c between commit a0bfa1373859 ("cpuidle: stop
depending on pm_idle") from Linus' tree and commit 18349ca4b42e ("x86:
Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call") from the rcu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index f693e44,dee2e6c..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@@ -137,8 -136,12 +137,14 @@@ void cpu_idle(void
enter_idle();
/* Don't trace irqs off for idle */
stop_critical_timings();
- if (cpuidle_idle_call())
+
- /* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
- rcu_enter_nohz();
- pm_idle();
- rcu_exit_nohz();
++ if (cpuidle_idle_call()) {
++ /* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
++ rcu_enter_nohz();
+ pm_idle();
++ rcu_exit_nohz();
++ }
+
start_critical_timings();
/* In many cases the interrupt that ended idle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists