[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110927001148.GA16174@huya.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:11:48 -0700
From: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] genirq: handling GIC per-cpu interrupts
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:18:36PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:03:05PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> > Tested on ARM Versatile Express (Cortex A15), ARM RealView PB11MP,
> > OMAP4 (Panda) and Tegra (Harmony). Patch series against next-20110923.
> >
> > From v2:
> > - Fixed !GENERIC_HARDIRQS build
> > - Fixed request_percpu_irq documentation
> >
> > From v1:
> > - General tidy-up after Thomas' review. I've kept the config option
> > for the time being until we can sort out the anonymous union
> > problem.
> >
> > Marc Zyngier (3):
> > genirq: add support for per-cpu dev_id interrupts
> > ARM: gic: consolidate PPI handling
> > ARM: gic, local timers: use the request_percpu_irq() interface
>
> I've tested this on an MSM8660 based off of next-20110926.
>
> Tested-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
> Acked-by: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Also tested on MSM8250.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists