[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201109272303.34603.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:03:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: tom.leiming@...il.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] PM/runtime: introduce trace points for tracing rpm_* functions
On Tuesday, September 27, 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 22:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > TP_printk("%pS:%s ret=%d", (void *)__entry->ip, __get_str(name),
> > > __entry->ret)
> > >
> > > try that.
> >
> > Well, that certainly will work, but is it the right fix?
>
> Hehe, yes! The pS means to take a pointer and return the string version
> of the address. Like "schedule+0x3a". __entry->ip is the address of the
> function that called it __THIS_IP__ but we want to convert that into a
> string name.
>
> We use ip because both perf and trace-cmd should be smart enough to
> parse it too. As they both store the kallsyms into the data file.
>
> The (void *) is used because pS wants a pointer, and we stored the
> address as an unsigned long.
OK, good.
I've applied both patches (with the above fix folded into the first one)
to linux-pm/pm-runtime (and merged into my linux-next branch), so they will be
pushed for 3.2.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists