[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317157252.21836.3.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:00:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, daniel.lezcano@...e.fr,
jbottomley@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [RFD 1/9] Change cpustat fields to an array.
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 19:20 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> /* Must have preemption disabled for this to be meaningful. */
> -#define kstat_this_cpu __get_cpu_var(kstat)
> +#define kstat_this_cpu this_cpu_ptr(task_group_kstat(current))
This just lost you a debug check, the former would whinge when called
without preemption, the new one wont. Its part of the this_cpu feature
set to make debugging impossible.
> +#else
> +#define kstat_cpu(cpu) per_cpu(kstat, cpu)
> +#define kstat_this_cpu (&__get_cpu_var(kstat))
> +#endif
>
> extern unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void);
>
> @@ -52,8 +62,8 @@ struct irq_desc;
> static inline void kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(unsigned int irq,
> struct irq_desc *desc)
> {
> - __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs[irq]);
> - __this_cpu_inc(kstat.irqs_sum);
> + kstat_this_cpu->irqs[irq]++;
> + kstat_this_cpu->irqs_sum++;
It might be worth looking at the asm output of that, I think you made it
worse, but I'm not quite sure how smart gcc is, it might just figure out
what you meant.
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists