linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:57:36 +0530
From:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues

* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2011-09-28 19:47:01]:

> * Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2011-09-28 10:04:27]:
> 
> > > Especially with higher number of logical CPUs. Likely cleaner way is to clear
> > > first_pick, second_pick on idle instead of clearing on tickless.
> > 
> > I think I tried that (cleared first/second_pick_cpu in
> > nohz_kick_needed() upon idle) but didn't get the best results.

which perhaps was beause I was relying on idle_at_tick (which can be
stale information as Suresh pointed out).

- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/