[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110928141701.GF8593@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:47:01 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues
* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2011-09-28 10:04:27]:
> > Especially with higher number of logical CPUs. Likely cleaner way is to clear
> > first_pick, second_pick on idle instead of clearing on tickless.
>
> I think I tried that (cleared first/second_pick_cpu in
> nohz_kick_needed() upon idle) but didn't get the best results. Let me
> try that again and post idle time numbers.
So made some changes so that first/second_pick_cpu identifiers are
cleared when corresponding cpus become idle. They are cleared in
pick_next_task_idle() ..
With that change, I don't see additional benefit of having a third busy
cpu kick ilb_cpu when it has > 1 task.
Idle time -> Avg. Std.Dev Min Max
W/o third busy cpu kicking 4.57% 0.9 3% 8%
With third busy cpu kicking 4.78% 1.1% 3% 8%
So will go with your suggestion in the next version!
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists