[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzGZp8YaQMMUMwV+pd_vnqR14CtiTmTtkXuotQBg0zspg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:22:56 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@....com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
> Could do something like:
>
> if (ticket->head >= 254)
> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0xff02);
> else
> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0x0002);
>
> to compensate for the overflow.
Oh wow. You havge an even more twisted mind than I do.
I guess that will work, exactly because we control "head" and thus can
know about the overflow in the low byte. But boy is that ugly ;)
But at least you wouldn't need to do the loop with cmpxchg. So it's
twisted and ugly, but migth be practical.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists