[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E835851.7070502@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:24:33 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@....com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
On 09/28/2011 10:22 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>>
>> Could do something like:
>>
>> if (ticket->head >= 254)
>> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0xff02);
>> else
>> prev = xadd(&ticket->head_tail, 0x0002);
>>
>> to compensate for the overflow.
>
> Oh wow. You havge an even more twisted mind than I do.
>
> I guess that will work, exactly because we control "head" and thus can
> know about the overflow in the low byte. But boy is that ugly ;)
>
> But at least you wouldn't need to do the loop with cmpxchg. So it's
> twisted and ugly, but migth be practical.
>
I suspect it should be coded as -254 in order to use a short immediate
if that is even possible...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists