[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317298919.2580.92.camel@deneb.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:21:58 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] C6X: New architecture
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 12:33 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > Show Details
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:41 EDT, Mark Salter said:
> >
> > > This architecture supports members of the Texas Instruments family
> > > of C6x single and multicore DSPs. The multicore DSPs do not support
> > > cache coherancy, so are not suitable for SMP.
> >
> > Is there a usage model for the multicore? I know somebody had some patches for
> > "HPC dedicated compute cores" that would just basically run a userspace process
> > and that's it - would those be applicable here?
>
> No, that's a different thing. Even with dedicated compute cores, you need
> cache coherency.
One thing that we plan to push later is an XIP model where cores can
share a
single kernel text image but run with their own copies of data. So you
end up
with something like a loosely coupled multiprocessor system with some
hardware
support for multicore communication and peripheral sharing.
--Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists