[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110929173006.GI25061@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:30:06 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: debug: Move DEBUG_ICEDCC into the DEBUG_LL
choice
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:22:42PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/29/11 03:39, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Agreed, software timing loops are the only option and it's impossible to get
> > them right everywhere. I think the Kconfig help text should be updated so
> > that the timeout paragraph is removed.
>
> Yes if you wait a long time the timeout for each character will expire
> and the execution will continue.
Well I got impatient, so I figured it was best to update the help text!
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > index 32b1be4..bfdf86b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> > @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ choice
> > prompt "Kernel low-level debugging port"
> > depends on DEBUG_LL
> >
> > + config DEBUG_LL_UART_NONE
> > + bool "No low-level debugging UART"
>
> Should this grow a long list of platforms that are in this choice menu?
> For example:
>
> depends on !FOOTBRIDGE && !ARCH_CLPS711X && ...
It might be nice to avoid that if we can. Once all the platforms have moved
over to the choice, we can delete the dummy option anyway.
> Otherwise
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Thanks,
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists