[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110929173103.GA22515@google.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:31:03 -0700
From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Elly Jones <ellyjones@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm: verity target
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:02:05 CDT, Will Drewry said:
>
> > I was just curious if there is any interest in pulling this change, or
> > if not, if there is any particular set of concerns, fixes, etc.
>
> Out of curiosity, how much of the stack does this end up eating? My root
> filesystem is already ext4 on an LVM partition that's on a LUKS/dm-crypt
> partition on a hard drive, and I'm sure somebody out there will have used xfs
> instead - and then exported it via NFS or something. Are we going to get weird
> stack overflows if people throw dm-verity into this sort of mix?
>
No. dm-verity uses very little stack since most of the code is running
in a separate workqueue context. The _map call is pretty light.
> > realize it's not a small amount of code to digest (though it is
> > smaller than the post from last year[1]). Would re-posting with an
> > added blob explaining the name be useful,
>
> Probably will need it to be merged, unless you set up an auto-reply that says
> "Patch rejected, 'verity' is *not* a typo for 'verify'" ;)
>
> I'll hopefully have some more comments over the weekend if I get some spare
> cycles.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists