linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: gic: add irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110929171540.GC6800@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Date:	Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:15:40 -0500
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	marc.zyngier@....com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
	jamie@...ieiles.com, b-cousson@...com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:53:55PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> 
> Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
> for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
> GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
> 
> The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
> GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
> for secondary GICs.

[...]

>  /*
> @@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>   */
>  static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
> -	u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> +	u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);

This can probably change simply to d->hwirq if irq_offset is
eliminated as I describe below.

>  void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
>  	void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
>  {
>  	struct gic_chip_data *gic;
> +	struct irq_domain *domain;
> +	int gic_irqs;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
>  
>  	gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
> +	domain = &gic->domain;
>  	gic->dist_base = dist_base;
>  	gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
> -	gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
>  
> -	if (gic_nr == 0)
> +	/*
> +	 * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
> +	 * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
> +	 */
> +	if (gic_nr == 0) {
>  		gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
> +		gic->irq_offset = 16;
> +		irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;

With the switch to irq_domain, there should no longer be any need for
a ~31 mask on the irq_start number.  Yes, you'll want to make sure
that it doesn't allocate below irq 16, but the driver should
completely use the irq_domain to manage the mapping from linux-irq
number to hwirq number.  The ~31 mask appears to have been an
optimization to quickly calculate hwirq number from the linux one, but
that value is now found in irq_data->hwirq.

irq_offset could almost be dropped entirely outside of probe because
it no longer matters.  Instead, populate the to_irq() hook so that the
hwirq value gets set correctly from the outset.

It would be better in general to have a consistent view of what the
hwirq number means regardless of if it is a root GIC.

g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/