[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110930174000.GB4163@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:40:02 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] drivers_base: platform: use always ->name for
uevent
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:09:14AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 04:29:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > If id_entry is available then it is used. However if we remove first the
> > > driver followed by the device, then the id_entry is pointing to driver's
> > > memory which is long gone.
> > > Since id->name and plat->name are equal there is no point in
> > > distinguishing them.
> > >
> > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > index 0cad9c7..cd71575 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > > @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static int platform_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> > > return rc;
> > >
> > > add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=%s%s", PLATFORM_MODULE_PREFIX,
> > > - (pdev->id_entry) ? pdev->id_entry->name : pdev->name);
> > > + pdev->name);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Just a gentle reminder on this patch. Greg, has this one been queued to
> > your drivers-core tree ? Should it go on -rc or now it's already too
> > late and going on merge window ?
>
> It's been in my drivers-core tree for a while, and I didn't think it was
> needed for 3.1, as it didn't solve an existing bug, did it?
>
> It's queued for 3.2, does it need to get into 3.1-stable? If so, I can
> do that.
I don't think it's needed. Just make sure drivers-core is merged before
your USB tree :-)
thanks
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists