[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yuny5x57vu1.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:01:58 -0700
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Unlock PCH_PP_CONTROL always
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:09:46 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> grep shows that we also write to PCH_PP_CONTROL in intel_lvds.c in the
> dpms functions - any reasons these two writes are left out?
Nope, I just didn't look there. I'll fix that. Locking registers with
magic patterns is just crazy these days.
--
keith.packard@...el.com
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists