[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yunvcs97vt5.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:02:30 -0700
From: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915: Check for eDP inside intel_edp_panel_vdd_on/off
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:13:55 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> Why not also move the id_edp check into edp_panel_on|off like for the vdd
> functions? This way it looks a bit inconsistent ...
Yeah, I can do that. May mean a few redundant checks, but they're cheap.
--
keith.packard@...el.com
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists