[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQjnOPiAOA_RiHnF-aVEYnWcdkwNzVD1BTNua+-ztZrW_+6_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:52:45 +0900
From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@...sung.com>,
"younglak1004.kim@...sung.com" <younglak1004.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of register_iommu
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
>>
>> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
>> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
>
> This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
>
Ok.
Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?
Thanks.
KyongHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists