[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111007113701.GC1512@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 13:37:01 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Sanghyun Lee <sanghyun75.lee@...sung.com>,
"younglak1004.kim@...sung.com" <younglak1004.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] iommu/exynos: Use bus_set_iommu instead of
register_iommu
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:52:45AM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Roedel, Joerg <Joerg.Roedel@....com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 03:31:49AM -0400, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >> From: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
> >>
> >> This replaces register_iommu() with bus_set_iommu() according to the
> >> suggestion of Joerg Roedel.
> >
> > This should be part of patch 3 already when the bus_set_iommu() change
> > is merged. Otherwise it breaks bisectability too.
> >
> Ok.
> Should I include fault handling feature (patch 4) in the patch 3 also?
Yes, makes sense to include patch 4 too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists