[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111001223914.GP11710@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 23:39:14 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specifics
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
> > Which tree will this go through? I don't think it should go via the
> > gpio tree since it is mostly within arch/arm.
>
> It'd dependent on Russells cleanups so it'll go through Russells
> tree and his gpio cleanup branch there.
It's dependent on other stuff elsewhere too:
error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:24
error: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c: patch does not apply
According to your patch, line 24 onwards is:
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <mach/hardware.h>
whereas I have this around line 24:
#include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h>
#include <mach/hardware.h>
So I've applied this with GNU patch instead, accepting the one line of
fuzz:
Hunk #1 succeeded at 23 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
As a result, I expect sfr will report a trivial merge conflict here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists