[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKnu2Mrzxb04X411B-bNPfRmdGuf6KbQK7EEfqztCbiM3fJsKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 23:15:44 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mach-ep93xx: break out GPIO driver specifics
2011/10/2 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> It'd dependent on Russells cleanups so it'll go through Russells
>> tree and his gpio cleanup branch there.
>
> It's dependent on other stuff elsewhere too:
>
> error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:24
> error: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c: patch does not apply
>
> According to your patch, line 24 onwards is:
>
> #include <linux/module.h>
>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
>
> whereas I have this around line 24:
>
> #include <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h>
>
> #include <mach/hardware.h>
Aha it's that moduleh git that is changing stuff all over the place.
> So I've applied this with GNU patch instead, accepting the one line of
> fuzz:
>
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 23 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
>
> As a result, I expect sfr will report a trivial merge conflict here.
OK thanks Russell that seems to get this one in atleast,
if I run into more trouble we should just call it a day with this
stuff for this merge window so we don't get too much conflicts
piled up.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists