[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317685462.3640.2.camel@phoenix>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:44:22 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kenneth Kiraly <kiraly@...126.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] ASoC: Avoid writing to WM8971_RESET in wm8971_resume
Writing to WM8971_RESET resets all registers to the default state.
Thus we should avoid writing to WM8971_RESET on resume.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
---
Hi,
While reading the code, I don't understand why we need to do (in wm8971_resume):
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8971_reg); i++) {
if (i + 1 == WM8971_RESET)
continue;
My understanding is that we want to avoid writing to WM8971_RESET on resume.
Thus I send this patch for review.
I don't have the hardware for testing, I'd appreciate if someone can test this patch.
Thanks,
Axel
sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
index 572bb80..7ec4165 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8971.c
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int wm8971_resume(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
/* Sync reg_cache with the hardware */
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wm8971_reg); i++) {
- if (i + 1 == WM8971_RESET)
+ if (i == WM8971_RESET)
continue;
data[0] = (i << 1) | ((cache[i] >> 8) & 0x0001);
data[1] = cache[i] & 0x00ff;
--
1.7.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists