[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111004085409.GA18566@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:54:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
acme <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [V3][PATCH 0/7] perf, x86: Implement AMD IBS
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:20 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > The only thing I'm not quite sure on is the userspace bits, but those
> > > are in the future work section as well, but possibly Ingo has a strong
> > > opinion here, sadly he doesn't have email atm :/
> >
> > With Lin's patch 'perf: Remove perf_event_attr::type check' we already
> > can sample with perf record.
> >
> > I think we could extend perf report to parse also ibs samples.
> > The only thing we need for it should be the pmu name/type mapping
> > in the perf.data header and the pmu type in the sample. See my
> > comment on Stephane's patch '[PATCH] perf: make perf.data more
> > self-descriptive (v5)'.
>
> OK, so Ingo really really wants to see a little more perf
> integration there. Acme, what's the state of Stephane's patch?
So the whole IBS thing looks quite unintegrated to me - and that's
partly because the hw is admittedly weird. The way we could perhaps
live with it upstream is two conditions:
- Testable IBS user-space code a bit more prominently integrated
than having to go down into a cellar with no working lights and
finding the code on display in tools/perf/Documentation/examples/
on the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused
lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard.'
- Only root/privileged users should be able to access it. Right now
i think it's root-only due to percpu restrictions, but wanted to
mention it that this is an explicit requirement.
Non-privileged IBS use could be enabled by having working integration
with generic events: we could add a upos generic event for example so
IBS could map to '-e uops:p' or such, to allow skid-less profiling on
AMD CPUs.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists