[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111006175808.GA9886@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:58:08 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
axboe@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: [GIT] Bcache version 12
Hi!
> It can cache filesystem metadata - it can cache anything.
>
> Because bcache has its own superblock (much like md), it can guarantee
> that bcache devices are consistent; this is particularly important if
> you want to do writeback caching. You really don't want to accidently
> mount a filesystem that you were doing writeback caching on without the
> ache - bcache makes it impossible to do so accidently.
>
> Is any of that useful?
I guess some kind of benchmark would be nice....? I don't know what
fair workload for this is. System bootup? Kernel compile after reboot?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists