[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111007160113.GB14201@tango.0pointer.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 18:01:14 +0200
From: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
harald@...hat.com, david@...ar.dk, greg@...ah.com,
Biederman Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: A Plumber’s Wish List for Linux
On Fri, 07.10.11 00:49, Matt Helsley (matthltc@...ibm.com) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:17:02AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > * simple, reliable and future-proof way to detect whether a specific pid
> > is running in a CLONE_NEWPID container, i.e. not in the root PID
> > namespace. Currently, there are available a few ugly hacks to detect
>
> Is that precisely what's needed or would it be sufficient to know
> that the pid is running in a child pid namespace of the current pid
> namespace? If so, I think this could eventually be done by comparing
> the inode numbers assigned to /proc/<pid>/ns/pid to those of
> /proc/1/ns/pid.
I think the most interesting test would be to figure out for a process
if itself is running in a PID namespace. And for that comparing inodes
wouldn't work since the namespace process would never get access to the
inode of the outside init.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists