[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14289.1318003632@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:07:12 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lennart@...ttering.net, harald@...hat.com, david@...ar.dk,
greg@...ah.com
Subject: Re: A Plumber’s Wish List for Linux
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 11:38:20 BST, Alan Cox said:
> > What do you mean would be ugly?
>
> I have an ext4fs. It supports every possible file name allowed by POSIX
> and SuS. What name are you going to use for your 'hidden directory' that
> won't clash with a real file ?
ext4 could always use an attribute bit for that. Not that *that* solution is all that
much prettier, since you can't use it for filesystems that don't have attribute bits.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists