[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111012.150207.1100668688848833225.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: bzolnier@...il.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cy82c693: fix PCI device selection
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:52:10 +0200
> David Miller wrote:
>
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:37:32 +0200
>>
>> > While at it remove redundant pci_get_slot() call as cy82c693_init_one()
>> > already takes care of keeping the reference on the second port's PCI
>> > device.
>>
>> Please do not submit unrelated changes with a bug fix, and as IDE is
>> in long-term maintainence I would not accept a risky refinement like
>> this anyways.
>
> Removed code is just bogus, we cannot fail in ->set_pio_mode method.
>
> Please take a look at the code:
>
> - /* select primary or secondary channel */
> - if (hwif->index > 0) { /* drive is on the secondary channel */
> - dev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, dev->devfn+1);
> - if (!dev) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: tune_drive: "
> - "Cannot find secondary interface!\n",
> - drive->name);
> - return;
> - }
> - }
>
> Please apply the patch,
Sorry, I will not do that, please respin the patch with the unrelated
pieces removed. I don't care how obvious it is to you.
The IDE layer is not a place for refinements or simplifications any
longer, I'm sorry if that isn't clear to you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists