[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201110131232.18514.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:32:18 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pata_serverworks: cleanup cable detection
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:05:38 +0200
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:11:44 +0200
> > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] pata_serverworks: cleanup cable detection
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Again no documentation although its at least a bit more obvious why
> >
> > The patch only merges identical cable routines for Dell and Sun
> > systems into common oem_cable() one. No behavior changes here.
>
> So put that that in the patch info. It seems fine to me but it ought to
> be there
Ok.
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] pata_serverworks: cleanup cable detection
Merge identical cable routines for Dell and Sun systems into
common oem_cable() one.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
---
v2: updated patch description
earlier references:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/18/324
drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c | 37 +++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c
@@ -57,32 +57,14 @@ static const char *csb_bad_ata100[] = {
};
/**
- * dell_cable - Dell serverworks cable detection
+ * oem_cable - Dell/Sun serverworks cable detection
* @ap: ATA port to do cable detect
*
- * Dell hide the 40/80 pin select for their interfaces in the top two
- * bits of the subsystem ID.
+ * Dell PowerEdge and Sun Cobalt 'Alpine' hide the 40/80 pin select
+ * for their interfaces in the top two bits of the subsystem ID.
*/
-static int dell_cable(struct ata_port *ap)
-{
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
-
- if (pdev->subsystem_device & (1 << (ap->port_no + 14)))
- return ATA_CBL_PATA80;
- return ATA_CBL_PATA40;
-}
-
-/**
- * sun_cable - Sun Cobalt 'Alpine' cable detection
- * @ap: ATA port to do cable select
- *
- * Cobalt CSB5 IDE hides the 40/80pin in the top two bits of the
- * subsystem ID the same as dell. We could use one function but we may
- * need to extend the Dell one in future
- */
-
-static int sun_cable(struct ata_port *ap)
+static int oem_cable(struct ata_port *ap)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
@@ -97,15 +79,10 @@ struct sv_cable_table {
int (*cable_detect)(struct ata_port *ap);
};
-/*
- * Note that we don't copy the old serverworks code because the old
- * code contains obvious mistakes
- */
-
static struct sv_cable_table cable_detect[] = {
- { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL, dell_cable },
- { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL, dell_cable },
- { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_SUN, sun_cable },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL, oem_cable },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL, oem_cable },
+ { PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_VENDOR_ID_SUN, oem_cable },
{ PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_OSB4IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, ata_cable_40wire },
{ PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB5IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, ata_cable_unknown },
{ PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_CSB6IDE, PCI_ANY_ID, ata_cable_unknown },
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists