[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318502628.24856.10.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:43:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Jan Glauber <jang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 10/10] jump-label: initialize jump-label
subsystem much earlier
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 17:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
>
> Initialize jump_labels much earlier, we can use them.
We can use them, where? how? what?, that sentence just begs for more.
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 2a9b88a..f4094ed 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void)
> acpi_early_init(); /* before LAPIC and SMP init */
> sfi_init_late();
>
> + jump_label_init();
> ftrace_init();
>
> /* Do the rest non-__init'ed, we're now alive */
Can we push them much earlier still? If possible I'd like them to be
before sched_init() so that I might use them there, if not possible, at
the very least before enabling interrupts would be nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists