[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E970690.3080207@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:41:04 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
<hjk@...sjkoch.de>, <gregkh@...e.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiang Kai-B18973 <B18973@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] uio: Support 36-bit physical addresses on 32-bit
systems
David Laight wrote:
> Since there is a discriminating field, could a union be used?
> At a guess the type of the address is constrained between
> produces and consumer??
I don't think we need to complicate the code by changing that variable into a
union. I just a want a short comment added to the structure definition. I
don't think that's asking a lot.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists