[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111013165431.b84ffab4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:54:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: andre.goddard@...il.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix strim() semantics for strings that have only blanks
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:31:57 +0200
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello Andre,
>
> With git commit 84c95c9acf088c99d8793d78036b67faa5d0b851 a patch from
> you went upstream where you wanted to improve the performance of the
> strim() function.
>
> Unfortunately this changed the semantics of strim() and broke my code. Before
> the patch it was possible to use strim() without using the return value for
> removing trailing spaces from strings that had either only blanks or only
> trailing blanks.
>
> Now this does not work any longer for strings that *only* have blanks.
>
> Before patch: " " -> "" (empty string)
> After patch: " " -> " " (no change)
>
> I think we should remove your patch to restore the old behavior.
>
> >From the description (lib/string.c):
>
> * Note that the first trailing whitespace is replaced with a %NUL-terminator
>
> => The first trailing whitespace of a string that only has whitespace
> characters is the first whitespace
Yes, that change makes sense.
> Also strim() explicitly does not have "__must_check", in order to use it
> without using the return value.
>
This observation seems to have nothing to do with the patch?
I think that strim() _should_ have __must_check annotation (which means
that strim() simply disappears, which is good). It is only safe to
ignore the strim() return value if the caller knows that the string
started with a non-space. The number of situations where this is
guaranteed are faily small, I suspect. Whereas the chances of someone
screwing this up are pretty high :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists