[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvw3KfPCwGbh+80PLYu9DNELvcyY1uHZRncKuRwtX2uc2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:53:59 +0200
From:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] fixing the UML failure root cause
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
> What do you think of this approach?  If it seems good, I'll finish the
> patch and submit it.
>
> With this patch applied, UML appears to work, but it fills the log with
> exploit attempt warnings.  Any ideas on what to do about that?
>
I can confirm that this patch works.
And I really like vsyscall=emulate because with that UML can trap vsyscalls. :-)
-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
