[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9CAB21.2020302@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:24:33 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] pci: Make sriov work with hotplug removal
On 10/17/2011 03:12 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Maybe this is the best we can do, but it still doesn't seem ideal, and
> it's certainly not obvious when reading the code. It doesn't seem
> right for the driver ->remove() method to be calling
> pci_destroy_dev(). Won't the core data structures be corrupted if a
> defective driver doesn't call pci_disable_sriov()? Seems like we
> could end up with a device that's been physically removed, but still
> has pci_dev structs hanging around.
i did add some print out in
pci_stop_bus_device
when stop PF, that function is called for those VFs.
also driver have to call pci_disable_sriov() and that is current design.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists