| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1318899645-4068-1-git-send-email-jistone@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:00:45 -0700
From: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Make kprobes' twobyte_is_boostable volatile
When compiling an i386_defconfig kernel with gcc-4.6.1-9.fc15.i686, I
noticed a warning about the asm operand for test_bit in kprobes'
can_boost. I discovered that this caused only the first long of
twobyte_is_boostable[] to be output.
Jakub filed and fixed gcc PR50571 to correct the warning and this output
issue. But to solve it for less current gcc, we can make kprobes'
twobyte_is_boostable[] volatile, and it won't be optimized out.
Before:
CC arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o
In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:22:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:17,
from [...]/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:44,
from [...]/arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:5,
from [...]/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:15,
from [...]/arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:6,
from include/linux/atomic.h:4,
from include/linux/mutex.h:18,
from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
from include/linux/kprobes.h:34,
from arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c:43:
[...]/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h: In function ‘can_boost.part.1’:
[...]/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:319:2: warning: use of memory input without lvalue in asm operand 1 is deprecated [enabled by default]
$ objdump -rd arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o | grep -A1 -w bt
551: 0f a3 05 00 00 00 00 bt %eax,0x0
554: R_386_32 .rodata.cst4
$ objdump -s -j .rodata.cst4 -j .data arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section .data:
0000 48000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 H...............
Contents of section .rodata.cst4:
0000 4c030000 L...
Only a single long of twobyte_is_boostable[] is in the object file.
After, with volatile:
$ objdump -rd arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o | grep -A1 -w bt
551: 0f a3 05 20 00 00 00 bt %eax,0x20
554: R_386_32 .data
$ objdump -s -j .rodata.cst4 -j .data arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.o: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section .data:
0000 48000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 H...............
0010 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
0020 4c030000 0f000200 ffff0000 ffcff0c0 L...............
0030 0000ffff 3bbbfff8 03ff2ebb 26bb2e77 ....;.......&..w
Now all 32 bytes are output into .data instead.
Signed-off-by: Josh Stone <jistone@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
index f1a6244..c0ed3d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -75,8 +75,10 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
/*
* Undefined/reserved opcodes, conditional jump, Opcode Extension
* Groups, and some special opcodes can not boost.
+ * This is volatile to keep gcc from statically optimizing it out, as
+ * variable_test_bit makes gcc think only *(unsigned long*) is used.
*/
-static const u32 twobyte_is_boostable[256 / 32] = {
+static volatile const u32 twobyte_is_boostable[256 / 32] = {
/* 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f */
/* ---------------------------------------------- */
W(0x00, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) | /* 00 */
--
1.7.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists