[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9CC93B.4000800@dsn.lapis-semi.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:32:59 +0900
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....lapis-semi.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
CC: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gpio-ml-ioh: Support interrupt function
Hi,
(2011/10/18 5:10), Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The linux-next patch 54be566317b6 "gpio-ml-ioh: Support interrupt
> function" generates a Sparse warning.
>
> + irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, IOH_IRQ_BASE, num_ports[j],
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> The last argument should be a NUMA node, not a GFP_ flag. I'm not
> sure what the right fix is. There are currently 5 callers in my
> cscope for this function in linux-next.
>
> 2 pass GFP_KERNEL which is wrong.
> 2 pass 0 which maybe should be cpu_to_node(0)?
> 1 passes -1 which maybe could be NUMA_NO_NODE?
>
I can understand your saying.
Seeing accepted other drivers, '0' or '-1' is used.
Focusing on GPIO driver, gpio-pca953x.c uses '-1'.
Though I tried to understand source code of irq_alloc_descs,
I can't understand which value we should use.
> Grant,
Could you help me ?
--
tomoya
ROHM Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists